Op-Eds
Milley's Treachery Reveals The Coup - 9/19
The Washington Post recently reported some explosive revelations regarding the conduct of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, under his previous boss, President Donald J. Trump. Specifically, the Post reported that General Milley called his Communist Chinese equivalent, General Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army, at least twice. Milley reportedly assured him, “We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.” The Post additionally reported that General Milley further comforted the Chinese general with the following astonishing pledge: “General Li, you and I have known each other for now five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”
Not only did Milley engage the Chinese, he also reportedly called the US admiral overseeing the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, the military unit responsible for Asia and the Pacific region, and recommended postponing some planned military exercises. The admiral complied. Note that Milley only “recommended’ the training be postponed; the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs possesses no command authority, and thus is unable to order any such action. However, occupying the highest rank in the military carries significant influence, chain of command notwithstanding. The CJCS has the ear of the President. Another reported incident starkly illustrates this reality: Milley also reportedly summoned senior officers to review the procedures for launching US nuclear weapons, explaining that he was to be involved. Looking each in the eye, Milley asked the officers to affirm that they had understood, in what he considered an “oath.” He reportedly secured such assurance from each officer, despite his lack of command authority.
Astonishingly, all of this allegedly happened while the US maintained a heightened alert status with China due to the occasion of the impending US presidential election, which the US worried the Chinese would try to influence electronically. That enhanced vigilance relating to the Chinese continued through the period until after the events at Capitol on January 6, which apparently caused the Chinese some degree of concern regarding the stability of the American federal government.
Critically, none of the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and the President of the United States (Milley’s boss), were aware of General Milley’s communications with the Chinese.
If the foregoing is true, it is probably biggest story in the world all year, reflecting some of the worst possible treasonous conduct imaginable. In his calls with General Li, Milley would have effectively traded allegiance to the United States for allegiance to a foreign adversary, while the US was in a heightened state of alert with respect to that nation. In his address and appeal to the senior US military leadership in charge of nuclear release, Milley would have effectively spearheaded a mutiny. It would be plainly illegal for Milley, who possess no command authority to effectively attempt to order his colleagues of inferior rank to ignore orders of the Commander in Chief unless Milley approved them. This conduct also represents a plain usurpation of civilian control of the military.
Milley himself has already responded to the revelations, and has said nothing to detract from their credibility. In fact, he appeared to both acknowledge the legitimacy of the allegations and to add to them. In his first public comments on the conversations, Milley said the alleged calls are “routine” and were done “to reassure both allies and adversaries in order to ensure strategic stability.” Here, we see that there were evidently a plurality of such calls. Second, Milley concedes that some were with “adversaries.” Third, he indicates he had been making such calls “routinely.”
We should bear in mind that Milley is set to appear before the US Congress to answer questions, undoubtedly including questions on this very matter, in the coming days. That testimony will be provided under oath, and there are certainly records of such calls. Therefore, Milley can do little else but to admit to the occurrence of such calls if they took place. Therefore, he is forced to do the only thing he can: to double down, and plead, quite astonishingly, that the calls in question were somehow legitimate. He will derive some comfort and cover from the fact that he knows the government-media complex will nearly uniformly back his outrageous defense. The fact that he mentioned other calls tells me that he understands he will be asked about the prevalence of such calls before Congress, and therefore is here attempting to get in front of the story by pretending there is nothing to hide, since such conduct was quite conventional. Of course, that is nonsense.
When discussing similar scenarios taking place in foreign countries, we general refer to such conduct as a “coup” or perhaps a “putsch.” We are naturally reluctant to invoke such language when discussing our own government, because we take great comfort in the presumption that such affairs are impossible in the United States. In a world seemingly gone mad, we jealously guard the sanctity of whatever comforts we may have.
Plainly stated, however, if true, Milley’s conduct amounts to a coup attempt. Of course, coups are never perpetrated by one person acting alone. When the coup is primarily conducted by civilian elements, it is critical to recruit sufficient military personnel to ensure the military cannot or will not be employed by the existing regime to repel the coup. Milley would appear to occupy such a role in the present scenario.
My opinion is that the allegations regarding Milley are consistent with what know for certain about General Milley, and thus are likely authentic. As I have said consistently over the course of my campaign for US Congress, the citizens of the United States presently find themselves the victims of a massive coup, nominally directed at the removal of Donald J. Trump from office through fabricated evidence supporting false claims, and later through the robbery of an election. As I have written and stated previously, I believe China was plainly involved in the election coup of November 2020. Insofar as Donald Trump was the people’s representative and choice, the coup was against both Trump and the American citizenry.
The consequences of Milley’s actions are quite chilling. Imagine the following, terrifying scenario: Seizing the truly unique opportunity of the situation to achieve a long-term goal, after Milley assures the Communists that we were not going to attack them without warning, China executes a long-planned military invasion of the nation of Taiwan. President Trump then decides to send US troops, sea and/or air assets, perhaps along with other coalition-nation troops, to Taiwan to aid in its defense. A young soldier on his way to Taiwan as a part of the deployment steels himself for the uncertainty he is about to encounter, but reassures himself with the thought of providing vital aid to a free country attempting to avoid totalitarian takeover. Little does he know that true to his word, Milley has already called the Communists, and alerted them to the plans. The Chinese are waiting for our soldier, and obliterate his transport before it has a chance to land in Taiwan.
“White Rage” Milley Must Face Consequences
It is clear that Milley must face consequences for his treachery. If an enlisted soldier had done anything remotely approaching this level of betrayal, he or she would rightly be vilified in the media and would immediately be court-martialed, convicted, and would likely be sentenced to life in prison or perhaps even death. Why should the outcome be any different for Milley? It should not. I have heard some commentators call for the formation of some form of investigative commission with the Congress. Although such a commission may be appropriate to investigate the scope and extent of the apparent coup attempt, insofar as it relates to Milley and his consequences, it is a terrible idea. It will only invite a media circus, politicization, grandstanding, and critically: massive and dangerous delay. That will give the Chinese and their American co-conspirators opportunity to pivot, react, deflect, and adjust course. This must be avoided.
The media should be reporting the story, not driving it. Any political commission would serve no legitimate purpose any more effectively than the military justice apparatus already in place. As I can attest as a former Army JAG prosecutor, the United States military enjoys a robust and fair law enforcement and military justice system. We can be confident that an enlisted soldier accused of such offenses would be subject only to such process, and the same should be applied to Milley. Further, the relevant facts don’t appear to require an extensive investigation, and the military justice process is designed to dispose of straightforward matters quickly. As noted, all relevant calls will have been recorded or transcribed, and all relevant meetings would have involved high-ranking officers readily scheduled for testimony.
Critically, however, Milley must be suspended from all duties pending the outcome of the process. If true, the allegations show that Milley represents a clear and present danger to the United States. Outrageously, fake president Joe Biden has determined to keep him on and indicated he has “complete confidence” in Milley. This indicates fairly conclusively to me, that fake president Joe is likely a part of any coup (after all, as I have written, the Chinese likely played an indispensable role installing Joe through stealing the election).
Assuming, then, that Milley is court-martialed, what could he be charged with? There are likely several articles under the Uniform Code of Military Justice which with Milley could be charged, but let’s consider one. Article 106a of UCMJ describes the crime of Espionage. That article basically states that any soldier who, with intent that it is to be used to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates to any foreign government information relating to the national defense, is guilty of Espionage. The article further provides that if the information communicated concerns nuclear weaponry, early warning systems, retaliation against large scale attack, war plans, or any other major element of defense strategy, the accused “shall be punished by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct.” Espionage is a capital offense, and, the facts alleged and perhaps admitted appear to support the charge.
Ugly Reality Revealed
This (most recent) embarrassment from “white rage” Milley reveals pretty clearly an incredible truth: China is running the current administration. But why? Why did Milley sell out his country, countrymen, comrades, and integrity to China? (It is helpful to first understand some important context. I recommend readers first read my recent piece on the Afghanistan withdrawal by way of background.)
Here is the explanation: Members of the global aristocracy enjoy the same lifestyle no matter which country they live in: the lives of Chinese elite are the same as American as British as Japanese as Saudi as Russian, etc. Therefore, the elite will support whichever global, dominant power which ensures the most power, prosperity, privilege, longevity and security for their families into the future. Once China offers them a better deal, from that perspective, than the current, US-led world order, they will do everything in their power to ensure Chinese hegemony, no matter what the cost to the serfs. The aristocracy themselves are only concerned with the long game for their own family dynasties.
I propose that is exactly what we are observing and what explains the current upside-down world we now reluctantly occupy. Once initiated, the progression of the transition of power from an existing power (the US) to a successor (China), becomes an accelerating cascade. As members of the elite “middle management” tier, such a Biden, Milley, Fauci, Blinken, etc., begin to appreciate that the transition effort is underway, they scramble to demonstrate their loyalty to the successor regime in ever more strident and aggressive manners. They do this in order to ingratiate themselves with the incoming ruling class and secure favorable placement and treatment in the new regime. This process accelerates as more and lower-level traitors see the process taking shape, and as the field of aspirants becomes more crowded, their efforts at achieving distinction become more aggressive to get noticed. Milley is a prime example of this phenomenon.
Thus, the process of transition accelerates, implicitly and explicitly encouraged by the successor regime. This process is particularly attractive to those members of “middle-management” who do not come from or possess bona fide elite credentials, but find themselves in positions valuable to the burgeoning transition. They appreciate that they can leverage their exploitation of those positions to obtain place in the new elite system. This may well describe Milley.
Such is the brilliance of the Chinese approach: they understood that to destroy their only obstacle to global dominance (the US-led Western system), they need only appropriate and co-opt the elites therein. Everything flows from that. As the famous Chinese general, Sun Tzu tell us: “The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.”
Good News
But there is some good news: this process can be halted. The elites know that they have not yet reached the critical tipping point at which their success is inevitable. The only advantage the free people of the world enjoy today is the only one we ever will: resistance in numbers. That advantage can still be relied upon to deliver victory so long as our resolve holds. But the first, indispensable step is cultivating general understanding of the process at work. As people with open eyes, it is incumbent upon us to use that knowledge to make others aware of the gravity of the current situation to the best of our abilities. Civil disobedience will play a prominent role, as will aggressive exercises of federalism. Both may even prompt constitutional crises. But no success can be achieved with exposing the process. The elites understand this; this is why we now see such aggressive, applications of censorship. The only way the elites can succeed in delivering control to the successor regime is by hiding their work. We have all heard: “The greatest lie the Devil ever told is that he does not exist.”
One important point: as the process of transition proceeds, the cost of mass resistance increases with each passing week and day (as we can see in the case of Australia, where the process has advanced somewhat further than in the US. Australia is a useful picture of what we will become if we don’t change our course). In other words, it is cheaper and less disruptive to resist today than tomorrow, and so on.
So, what does all this mean? In addition to spreading the truth, each of us needs to make a decision on how we will respond when tyranny arrives on our doorstep. Whether this be at your child’s school, at your workplace, at your university or college, with your friends or family, each must decide now how far he or she will be pushed without drawing a line and saying “no further.” Because when tyranny visits your threshold, it will be too late to make a rational decision. What is your children’s freedom worth to you? What can you do, today, to tip the likelihood of victory ever so slightly to the advantage of the free?
Understand that we are witness to truly historic lawlessness, deceit, evil and corruption. This is why I am running for US Congress: this is something I can do today to change the course we are on, for my kids and yours. Because make no mistake, we are in an existential crisis, a cold Civil War that threatens to go hot. The media will urge rage toward anyone who points any of this out, so count the cost, but remember that “when tyranny becomes law, resistance becomes duty.”
Biden’s China Policy: The Big Picture and the 47-Mile Afghanistan-China Border - 8/14
When I served as an Army Plans Officer in Germany, I worked in a secure-compartmentalized intelligence facility (SCIF) drafting global contingency plans as a part of a US Army Corps staff. During that time, I worked with some of the finest officers and enlisted members from all branches of the military and with backgrounds in all types of operations, including engineering, intelligence, supply, civil affairs, medical, artillery, infantry and with other legal officers such as myself. In that role, I gained perspective and insight into how to connect the dots and see the big strategic picture.
What follows is my assessment of one scenario that could explain the dangerously arbitrary and inexplicable foreign policy we are currently seeing out of the Biden administration as it relates to China. The reader should understand that the following assessment is based on my professional speculation, although the theories advanced make neat sense of the chaos we are observing. I will address three separate, massively significant occurrences and tie them together as they relate to the Biden policy on China. My assessment below is focused on communicating the big picture, and therefore is only presented at a very high level in this piece. Rest assured there are many more moving parts than those identified here.
COVID
The story begins in the late summer or fall of 2019. SARS-COV-2 (COVID) had evidently escaped or been released from a CCP military controlled lab in Wuhan, China. The local population had become sick, doctors and researchers fell ill, and Beijing began to implement a series of responses. They told the world it was not communicable between humans, and they had it under control. At the same time, they sealed off Wuhan to travel within China, but opened Wuhan up to international travel, spreading the virus all over the world.
In response, President Trump began a massive Chinese-accountability campaign, desperately opposed by the media and elements of the residual government-media complex that was still an artifact from the Obama years. President Trump referred to the virus as the “China Virus,” closed off travel from China to the US, proposed that the virus originated from the Wuhan Lab, and famously suggested that the CCP owed the US at least $10 trillion in reparations.
Under the high-pressure trade scheme previously implemented by Trump against the CCP, including tariffs, the Chinese economy had been experiencing a massive economic setback vis-à-vis the US. Beijing understood that if Trump were permitted to continue to push the international community toward Chinese accountability for COVID, he would likely succeed. This would be due to massive popular support for such an approach as well as the unmatched international influence of the US.
What China faced was therefore a complete collapse of all of its efforts at ascendency over the previous decades. This realization must have been chilling. They observed how Trump pushed back aggressively against the CCP-controlled WHO, and how he seemingly refused to be bullied by the CCP-influenced US media. The Chinese also understood that should the US take a different tack, one of ignoring or misdirecting on the origin of COVID, accountability might be avoided.
The 2020 Election
The CCP understood they urgently needed to come up with a plan to save themselves from Trump. They were trapped in a terrible trade situation thanks to Trump’s aggressive policies, and were facing looming accountability for COVID, which threatened to set them back decades if not more. They considered their options. They knew that their odds for survival with Trump in office were slim. They had to either get him out (through impeachment or otherwise) or at least, make sure he was not reelected.
China would have most certainly, without any doubt, considered their odds for influencing the 2020 presidential election. I believe they must have been giddy with excitement when they realized how straightforward and feasible it would be to rig a US election.
Dominion Voting Systems is the company that manufactures the computers on which many US states conduct their elections. Dominion Voting Systems is owned by a company named Staple Street Capital. As reported by the Gateway Pundit, “On Oct 8, 2020, Staple Street Capital filed SEC Form D, [showing] offerings and sales amounts of $400,000,000, with the Sales Compensation Recipient identified as UBS Securities. … UBS Securities is a Swiss investment bank which owns 24.99% of UBS Securities Co LTD, a Chinese Investment Bank. The remaining 75% of UBS Securities CO LTD is owned by the Chinese government,” the report noted. Further, it has been reported that the Core Infrastructure Manager of Information Technology at Dominion Voting Systems, Anthony Huang, worked for China Telecom from 1998-2002. China Telecom is reportedly “wholly run by the Chinese government, and has been identified by the U.S. Department of Defense as having collaborated with the country’s military for over two decades.”
China must have identified the opportunity Dominion presented. To the extent the CCP determined to interfere in the election, therefore, the question would remain: which candidate to back? Keep in mind the diverse and talented field of aspiring challengers to Trump during the Democratic presidential primary season leading to 2020. There were many popular, dynamic and charismatic candidates, including Sens. Liz Warren, Bernie Sanders, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand and Kamala Harris. There were other big names such as Michael Bloomberg, Pete Buttigieg, Tom Steyer, Julian Castro, and Beto O’Rourke.
But there was one candidate who would have been particularly intriguing to Beijing. It has been widely reported that the Biden family received hundreds of millions of dollars from Beijing. In 2014, when then Vice President Biden was in Beijing meeting with Xi Jinping, Hunter Biden left with a $1.5 billion investment from the Chinese government in his Rosemont Seneca Partners firm, according to a report by Peter Schweizer in his 2018 book “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends.” The New York Post reported that “[i]n 2015, a state-backed real estate conglomerate acquired a controlling stake in Rosemont Realty, a sister company of Rosemont Seneca where Hunter served as an advisor. As part of the deal, the Chinese promised $3 billion for commercial office property acquisitions in the US — a major windfall for the company.” The piece further provides that in May 2017, Hunter met with Ye Jianming, chairman of Chinese energy company CEFC, to discuss investment opportunities in the US. After the meeting, Ye reportedly sent a 2.8-carat diamond to Hunter along with a “thank you” card. Additionally, anonymous Chinese donors contributed more than $22 million to the Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement at the University of Pennsylvania. Other financial connections between the Bidens and China have been identified, but I present only a sample here to provide some context for what follows.
Recall that, for quite some time, Joe Biden was not considered a particularly popular or strong candidate for the Presidency. He placed fourth by votes in Iowa, and fifth in New Hampshire. After that, in a very conspicuous display of coordinated support, the entire Democrat establishment seemed to come to his vociferous aid, and he won the South Carolina primary. This was despite the fact that real questions were being raised from all quarters about Biden’s physical and mental fitness. His obvious deterioration, when compared to his demeanor only a few years ago, was quite conspicuous and alarming. Nonetheless, these concerns were aggressively and abruptly dismissed in the media. Would Biden’s vulnerability and frailty have proven attractive to Beijing? Maybe. Suddenly, only about 8 months before the general election, ten of his former competitors endorsed him as the nominee. From that point on, Biden was the presumptive nominee.
As nominee, Biden frequently directed pointed criticism at President Trump’s response to COVID, in particular to Trump’s consistent habit of pointing blame at the Chinese government. Biden called Trump’s responses to the emerging virus “xenophobic” and repeatedly criticized Trump’s imposition of a travel ban from China.
November 3
The 2020 election was riddled with anomalies. From the reporting, the calling of states, the progress of vote counts, the lack of transparency, to the protracted duration of the some of the vote counts, commentators have been speculating about the election with unabating concern every day since it was held. Evidence has been advanced that is alleged to show that Dominion Voting Systems computers were accessed by Chinese actors during the 2020 election. An affidavit affixed to a Georgia lawsuit brought by attorney Sidney Powell claims to present “unambiguous evidence” that Dominion Voting Systems servers were accessible to and were “certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China. The Dominion software was accessed by agents acting on behalf of China and Iran in order to monitor and manipulate elections, including the most recent US general election in 2020.” Other analyses found Dominion’s server has been accessed by a network from Hunan, China. Such activities have widely been cited as possible explanations for the seemingly impossible, official election results observed on November 3, 2020 and in the days and weeks following. Without a doubt, 2020 was likely one of the most controversial elections in modern history.
In the wake of the election, lawsuits have been filed, affidavits of fraud assembled, audits commissioned, and analyses conducted. Much debate remains on what actually took place. What is not debatable is that the allegation of widespread fraud in the 2020 election is one of, if not the most, censored topic in America. No one is allowed to ask any question, no matter how reasonable or obvious, without being aggressively attacked and marginalized by the government-media complex. The Biden administration’s DHS has gone so far as to classify claims of fraud in the 2020 election as a “potential terror threat.” I can think of no other major political issue of such broad interest and with so many evident questions that has been so ruthlessly demonized and prohibited from discussion. Why is that?
The Biden Presidency
Did Biden really with the election? Is he a CCP plant? Did the Chinese government facilitate a full-scale political coup, with the cooperation of the Democrat Party, within the greatest and most formidable democracy the world has ever seen? What clues can be gleaned from Biden’s behavior since assuming office of the President?
Narrative Control
First, immediately upon assuming office, the government-media complex went into overdrive to suppress any suggestion that the virus originated from a Chinese lab. We all remember the “bat soup” theory that was widely offered as the only reasonable explanation. We also remember that anyone who suggested the obvious: that the corona virus might have originated from the corona virus lab operating in the city where the virus appeared, was roundly vilified and cancelled. That is very odd. Why would the government-media complex not want the American people to know the truth about the virus origin? It appeared they were acting to protect the Chinese, but why? Now, of course, we know with almost certainty that the virus was created by Chinese scientists in a lab. The government-media complex was lying.
Whatever the reason, it is clear that the people who least benefited from Biden’s approach were the American people, and the people who benefited the most were the CCP.
The practice of carefully-curating the narrative, almost obsessively and without regard for legitimate or widely-harbored questions, has been one hallmark of the Biden administration and its media confederates. So has the practice of demonizing those who subscribe to or raise the possibility of any counter-narratives. The Biden administration, in partnership with their media allies, have systematically policed the avenues of formerly-free expression, such as the major social media platforms, to squelch any question, any dissent, and any conversation, even as they change the official narrative on a near-daily basis. This type of censorship is the norm in the Chinese police state, but thankfully has remained a mostly foreign experience for most Americans, until today.
There have many other actions taken and decisions made by the Biden administration that appear to be directly harmful to US interests and beneficial to the CCP of China. However, I am going to omit discussion of those here, and skip directly from the most salient, Chinese, and pervasive aspect of the Biden administration (narrative control and propaganda), to the most recent issue that has arisen: that of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Afghanistan
After the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the US went on the build some of the most robust military, intelligence and diplomatic apparatus in the US inventory, right in Afghanistan. One can appreciate why: Afghanistan lies in one of the most strategically important areas of the world. Afghanistan shares a 572-mile-long border with Iran. And, critically, the worn-torn country shares a 47-mile-long border with China! Notably, the two main countries alleged to have hacked our 2020 elections were Iran and China.
Until just days ago, the US maintained an enormous military presence in Afghanistan. At Bagram Airfield alone, which covers 6 square miles, over 40,000 people have been employed at any given time and over 100,000 US troops have spent time there. The prison on the Airbase holds nearly 5,000 inmates at a time. Major medical facilities, two massive runways, parking spots for over 100 fighter jets, all exist at Bagram, which reportedly cost over $800 Billion to construct.
The US spent 20 years in Afghanistan, undoubtedly using the country as an outpost to conduct intelligence gathering against regional powers such as China, Pakistan and Iran. Then, very abruptly, President Biden decided to pull everyone out with no warning or explanation and go on vacation to Camp David. Meanwhile, Taliban warlords have now inherited the billions of dollars of military equipment and facilities abandoned by the US.
It is painful, as a veteran of the Global War on Terror, to witness the utter contempt displayed by Biden to the thousands of US veterans who have served in that fight over the last two decades. Biden has gifted our sworn enemies, who have killed our comrades, with billions of dollars of US weaponry, which will undoubtedly be used against US interests around the world. What can explain such a move? Vindictiveness to veterans? Surely there is more to the story.
Conclusion
I propose one explanation for all of the above: Biden, as China’s US Viceroy, was ordered by Beijing to pull out of Afghanistan. That is the only reasonable explanation I can come up with. China owns the putative US president, Joe Biden. The implications for national security global peace are chilling.
To be clear: It appears to me, in my professional opinion as a former US Army Plans Officer, JAG Officer, attorney, and patriot, that the US has been taken over in a political coup co-sponsored by the Democrat Party, the CCP, and the government-media complex.
They are wasting zero time wielding their newfound power to pillage and destroy the United States. In the span of only seven short months, they have trashed the US economy, defiled the rule of law, destroyed the public health system, opened the border completely, obliterated our legacy in Afghanistan, imposed draconian infringements on civil liberties, weaponized the justice system, crippled law enforcement apparatus, deployed the intelligence services against their political opponents, indoctrinated and purged the military, and closed our public-school systems. All this, of course, after they stole a US presidential election.
The only force left to oppose this juggernaut is the American Patriot. Now is the Final Hour; this is the Final Hill. If we don’t save the country now, it will most assuredly be lost forever.
Protecting our Civil Liberties from COVID madness - 8/7
COVID-19 is being used by our enemies to destroy our civil liberties, and they don’t plan to restore them…
Americans should be horrified as they watch the civil liberties of people all over the globe being crushed by autocratic governments drunk with a COVID-fueled lust for control. Even as disarmed Europeans flock to the streets by the hundreds of thousands in a futile attempt to persuade their leaders to relent from the punishing cycle of abusive and tyrannical restrictions, each week predictably brings new, increasingly irrational, and exasperating erosions of civil liberties long taken for granted.
This is no accident; it is coordinated and by design. People are beginning to understand something terrifying: the COVID madness will never end, and perhaps their freedoms, now appreciated anew, will be lost forever. The enemies of freedom have tasted their nectar and it has only inflamed an appetite for more control.
- In Australia, the citizenry is on lockdown as the government has deployed helicopters and drones equipped with loudspeakers to track and corral any formerly-free citizen who dares to breath fresh air without a mask, stand too close to a loved one, or gather in a group. They have deployed the military to go door to door, terrorizing citizens and routinely meting out brutality to punish and deter any dissent. Meanwhile, they ominously inform the helpless citizenry to expect the same well into 2022.
- Italy has already imposed COVID passports required to enter gyms, swimming pools, museums, cinemas, theatres, sports stadiums, and other public venues, including indoor seating areas at bars and restaurants.
- In France, the government has imposed lockdowns with a strict curfew from 6:00 pm at night until 5:00 am in the morning, with no movement allowed except for essential reasons.
- In Germany, oppressive mandates have people demonstrating in the streets, often leading to brutal clashes with militarized police, even as special interest groups like LGBT pride events attracting tens of thousands are permitted unhindered.
Truly chilling, and they are planning the same thing here in our beloved USA. Such extreme measures, administered by bureaucrats with almost no accountability to the electorate and absent the robust civil liberties protections we have enjoyed in the US up until now, are leading to violent pushback from frustrated citizens.
The current, illegitimate administration in the US, emboldened by their CCP sponsors, covets such power. We must understand that this is coming here. However, free Americans have a huge advantage: the US Constitution. But the protections afforded by that august document are not self-executing – they must be exercised by the populace to have any value or impact.
We have the tools to prevent the USA from becoming a COVID police state. Those tools rust in the shed unless we remember how to use them, and if we don’t use them, the next time we go to the shed to collect them, they will have been stolen in the night by our enemies.
“Zero COVID” strategies are scientifically baseless, impossible to achieve, and only serve to create an illusory, unattainable goalpost to justify continued imprisonment of formerly free populations. The time to engage is now. We no longer enjoy the luxury of relegating the maintenance of our civil liberty infrastructure to the government we have elected, because we no longer have the government we elected. Our way of life in a free society is under assault at a level not seen in generations. This is the last hill, for if our enemies prevail, there will no longer be any room for dissent: freedom will be outlawed and all avenues of legitimate dissent will be foreclosed.
I stand ready to resist by all legitimate means the rapidly-encroaching elimination of our civil liberties. As an accomplished attorney and civil libertarian who fundamentally understands the essential preeminence of the protection of personal freedom, I will fight as long as I have the ability to preserve what generations of selfless Americans have purchased with their blood: our freedom.
Your Title Goes Here
Your content goes here. Edit or remove this text inline or in the module Content settings. You can also style every aspect of this content in the module Design settings and even apply custom CSS to this text in the module Advanced settings.
“I have never observed such a coordinated, well-resourced, possibly existential constellation of threats directed at our country and way of life as I do today. As a father and citizen I am unable to justify standing by at this point and doing nothing.”
